If we assume there is no bias, what conclusions can be drawn about the population's opinion of the speed limit change? Justify your response. Bold text start The majority of participants in oldest age group did not respond - 55 The majority of participants ages 25-29 voted in favour - 80 out of 115 The majority of youngest age group voted yes in favour as well with 45 out of 85 45 out of 95 45/95 = 0.47 = 47% 80 out of 115 = 80/115 = 0.6956 = 69% 55 out of 75 = 73% of voters in the group of 30-34 did not respond 5 our of 75 = 5 / 75 = 6.7% of voters in the group of 30-34 votes yes in favour 15 out of 75 = 0.2 = 20% of vowers in the group of 30-34 voted no against 6% votes yes (in favour) group of 30-34 20% votes no (against ) in group of 30-34 69% voters yes (in favour) - group of 25-29 47% votes yes (in favour) - group of 20-24 Vote between the two first group were much more balanced as opposed to the significant drop of voting in favour and because of that although we assume there is no bias the group of 30-34 has the biggest influence of the perception of voting in favour because 69% did not respond and as a result it is the only group where the major of the members voted against as opposed to in favour of the speed limit change. I want you to use this information to come up with a paraphrase justifying that althouhgh no bias is assumed the oldest group has the biggest influence on the final result and how it impacts it