Question
If we say, 'less good drugs approved, indicate if each is True or False FDA became stricter FDA became more leinient More bad drugs approved
- If we say, 'less good drugs approved", indicate if each is True or False
- FDA became stricter
- FDA became more leinient
- More bad drugs approved
- More bad drugs disapproved
- More good drugs disapproved
- Less bad drugs approved
- Less good drugs disapproved
- Less bad drugs disapproved
- Type 1 errors decrease
- Type 2 errors increase
- Given
Treatment A Cost: $4,000 Effectiveness: 60%
Treatment B Cost: $5,000 Effectiveness: 70%
Treatment C Cost: $3,000 Effectiveness: 50%
Treatment D Cost: $4,000 Effectiveness: 70%
Treatment E Cost: $5,000 Effectiveness: 80%
Treatment F Cost: $3,000 Effectiveness: 60%
Treatment G Cost: $3,000 Effectiveness: 70%
Treatment H Cost: $4,000 Effectiveness: 50%
Treatment I Cost: $2,000 Effectiveness: 60%
- Rearrange table so it will be ready for obvious domination analysis
- Use the ___ obviously dominates ____ (or ___OD ___) method
- What are the treatments left for ICER analysis (or marginal domination analysis)
- Use ICER to determine if any treatments are marginally dominated.
- Draw the CEF graph
- If the FDA reduces the number of steps required to pass Phase 3, say if the following would be True or False:
- Increase in Type 1 errors
- More good drugs will be approved
- More good drugs will be approved
- Less good drugs will be approved
- Less good drugs will be disapproved
- Decrease in Type 1 errors
- When the pharmaceutical company's patent expired, the company was in the middle of implementing a process that would make it cheaper to produce the drug without compromising quality. Which of the following is true?
- Patent expired on the positive slope side of the innovation graph
- Patent expired on the negative slope side of the innovation graph
- Patent expired at the very top of innovation graph
- Given the different treatment options available below, determine obvious domination for each using the "IS OBVIOUSLY DOMINATED BY (__IODB___)" method
- Which of the following treatments are obviously dominated?
- Which treaments are not obviously dominated and will move on the ICER analysis
- From Z where will the patient go next?
- From W where will the patient go next?
Treatment Cost Benefit
Treatment A $4,000 12 years
Treatment B $4,000 15 years
Treatment X $5,000 10 years
Treatment Q $6,000 12 years
Treatment W $3,000 9 years
Treatment E $6,000 16 years
Treatment R $7,000 15 years
Treatment T $4,000 14 years
Treatment Y $5,000 11 years
Treatment U $8,000 15 years
Treatment V $8,000 24 years
Treatment Z $2,000 7 years
- When uninsured cost of office visits was $400 and patient goes twice a year.
When insurance was acquired, coinsurance = 30%, and patient went every month.
- Using classical theory is there moral hazard with the acquisition of insurance? What is the social loss.
- Using the Nyman theory, assume the patient really needs to go every month given a certain condition he/she has that requires frequent monitoring. What kind of moral hazard is this? What is the value of social loss from the insurance?
- Using the IHL theory,
- Assume IHL is achieved at 2 office visits a year. What is the social loss value?
- Assume IHL is achieved at 12 office visits a year. What is the social loss value?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started