ii. The government wants to be sure that they are getting what they paid for in a climate policy advisor, so they decide to get a second opinion by hiring a graduate from UC Davis that recently took a course in natural resource economics (most likely in the Spring of 2020). The consultant instead advises the government to implement a per- unitvolume subsidy on the timber harcest equal to $2.25 51 tha the per-unit-volume price of timber for the forester is pf+2.25. is the consultants policy a good recommendation? Is the society better off with a per-unit-volume subsidy on timber harvest equal to $2.25? explain