I'm in the hospital had major surgery, just not feeling well. Please help me.

These facts have been presented as evidence in the trial of Reginald Chase for the murder of Lucerne Ludlow. Use them in considering your verdict.

Information below.

Lucerne was found deceased on the morning of Valentine's Day in her Beverly Hills mansion. The coroner ruled the cause of Lucerne's death to be arsenic poisoning. Reginald had access to high quantities of arsenic due to a rat infestation in his Malibu beach home. Lucerne also had access to high quantities of arsenic due to a rat infestation in her mansion. On February 13, Reginald posted a cryptic message on social media. Quote: "Cheaters never win." GPS data from Reginald's smartphone reveals he was in Beverly Hills in the early morning of February 14. Lucerne cheated on Reginald with his best friend, Patrick Justice, prior to their divorce. Reginald won custody of the couple's two children in the divorce. Before her death, Lucerne was seeing a psychologist for depression and anxiety. Reginald recently became engaged to celebrity chef, Paloma Pillsbury, whom Lucerne was competing against for a hosting position on a hot new reality TV show. Paloma and Lucerne had a very public disagreement in an elevator at the most recent Oscars after party. Reginald's most recent film, a glitzy film adaptation of F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Beautiful and the Damned, was a critical and financial flop

This what I said below.

Based on this information, there are other convincing factors that indicate Reginald's culpability.His possession of arsenic enables him to carry out the act of poisoning. The enigmatic social media message suggests a purpose, particularly considering Lucerne's unfaithfulness. His proximity to the crime site in Beverly Hills on the morning of the murder indicates that he was present there.Lucerne's friendship dynamics and the loss of custody may have contributed to the development of wrath and resentment.The engagement to Paloma Pillsbury provides another incentive, considering Lucerne's rivalry with Paloma for a television presenting role.The lack of success of his most recent picture may have contributed to further financial strain.

Although individual pieces of evidence may not be definitive, when considered together, they provide a comprehensive portrayal of a man who has both the motivation and the means to conduct the crime, as well as the opportunity and a prospective psychological condition that would facilitate such actions. Hence, considering the supplied evidence, I am inclined to condemn Reginald Chase for the murder of Lucerne Ludlow.

Questions below.

Examine the results of the jury's decision to convict or acquit and consider the process and the reasoning you and your colleagues gave for their votes. Reflect, too, on what you have learned about groupthink "Write a" post that reflects on the deliberation and considers the wider implications of groupthink for society. Consider: To what extent was the verdict in this case an example of groupthink? Where else do you see groupthink in our society? What implications does groupthink have for social welfare and social change?

I have him down as guilty, but then I changed my mind to not guilty. Three of my classmates said guilty, five said he should be acquitted because they need more evidence and two not guilty.

Can you please provide a reference.