I'm trying to determine the "relevant" facts in this pretend pleading case. I have written down what I think is relevant and admissible in court but need an expert opinion. Here is the case...

On January 1, 2020, I was fired from my job in violation of the speech clause of the Texas Constitution. I had been employed with Employer, Inc. for twenty years. On October 31, 2019, I posted my disagreement with my work's stance on the use of computers.I sent emails to my supervisors on several occasions complaining of the same. I also spoke to several of my co-workers about the problem. I wrote and posted several letters to all the newspapers in the city. In late November 2019, I stood outside my office building with a sign protesting.

On or about December 2019, my supervisor met with me in her office and warned me about speaking out against the agency. During that meeting, my boss showed my annual evaluations that were filled with lies about my previous work. I was able to record this meeting.

On or about December 15, 2019, I witnessed and overheard my boss and her supervisor talking about me saying they needed to get rid of me before the national press gets wind of my complaints. I submitted a public information act request of all my supervisors' personnel files and they confirm that I was on their hit list because I spoke out against the agency.

My previous supervisor gave me positive reviews. I have perfect attendance. I have been a team player for the entire time I have been employed with Government Employer. Therefore, my termination can only be because I exercised my right to free speech under the Texas Constitution.