Imagine a scenario where a theft has occurred in a retail store. The store owner claims that they saw the defendant, Tom, stealing merchandise on the store's surveillance footage. However, Tom denies the accusation and asserts that he was nowhere near the store at the time of the alleged theft. The prosecution seeks to introduce the surveillance footage as evidence against Tom.

• Consider any objections that Tom's defence lawyer might raise regarding the surveillance footage and discuss how the court might rule on these objections
• ensure that the explanation are in very strong point in order to win a case