Imagine that you are an organizational consultant for the SNHU Pet Supply Company. You have been asked to recommend who should lead a new initiative to expand the company's online presence. After several discussions and interviews, the leadership team has shortlisted two candidates. Each candidate brings a different set of skills and expertise to the table, and each also poses a few challenges.

The first candidate, Myra, is a 15-year veteran of the organization who has worked her way up from an intern to a very capable product manager. She has extensive knowledge of the company's products and services and embodies the company's culture and vision in her work. Myra is not well-versed in e-commerce and the technologies that will be needed to implement and launch the company's online initiative. However, she is a fast learner, and the management position doesn't require too much in-depth knowledge of technologies.

The second candidate, Michael, was hired six months ago and shows great promise as a leader and manager. He has an MBA from a reputable university and worked for a technology startup for three years before joining the company. He has no experience in pet supplies or related industries, but knows how to launch an online company from the ground up.

Based on the above scenario how can I -

• Compare and contrast two different decision-making models rational and intuitive , explaining how each would be used to approach the hiring decision.
• Recommend which of the two decision-making models rational or intuitive would be the best suited to help make the hiring decision, and why.