Import favorites @ Infonet Home @ Citrix Workspace Countdown: Days: -6 Time:-08:39:20 Select one analogy. To determine whether there is a relationship between the type of school attended and verbal reasoning scores for Irish students, three samples with as students, in each group, were randomly selected from data used by Raferty and Hout (1985), One group of arodents attended secondary school, the securityroup of students allended vocational school, and the third group consisted of students who attended only primary school Raftery, A.E. and Hout M. (1985), Dees fish education approach the mericocratic Ideal? A logistic analysis. Economic aid Social Review: 16, 137 110. The following by pathiest were tested: Happy do not all equal Theanalysis was win on the doing ind the following output was obtained; ANOVA table Source SS MS F-Stat -.value Treatments] 2 11040207 5520 2434 41:381916 20.0001 72 9609 28 133 48227 Total 74 20649 787 Which of the following is an appropriate conclusion based on the output? A. O Fail to reject II, and conclude that the data provide strong evidence that the three mean verbal reasoning scores ( representing the three types of schools attended ) are not all equal. B. Fail to reject H and conclude that the data do not provide sufficient evidence that there is a relationship between the type of school attended and verbal reasoning scores for Irish students. C. O Reject HI and conclude that the data provide strong evidence that there is a relationship between the type of school attended and verbal reasoning scores for Trish students. D. O Reject H and conclude that the data provide strong evidence that verbal reasoning scores are related to type of school in the following way: the mean verbal reasoning score for Irish students who attended secondary school is higher than the mean verbal reasoning score for Irish students who attended vocational school, which in turn is higher than that of Irish students who attended only primary school