in 150 words, how do you agree with this prompt? I believe Rita Evenwell was done injustice by Phillip Van Houten. In this scenario, the outcome of the dispute between Philip Van Houten and Rita Evenwell will depend on various legal principles and contract laws, particularly whether the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) applies and how it's interpreted in the District of Columbia. One reason we can see Rita Even well being done injustice is if we look at the acceptance, the communication of acceptance via email could constitute a valid acceptance, especially if email is considered an acceptable form of communication according to the contract laws. However, the change in terms made by Van Houten when the contract was mailed to her house might pose an issue under the mirror-image rule, which states that an acceptance must mirror the terms of the offer for a contract to be formed. Even if Evenwell assented to the change in terms, the question remains whether this acceptance was in line with the original offer or constituted a counteroffer. The UCC generally governs the sale of goods transactions. In this case, the sale of the boat falls under the UCC's article 2 to see if it's considered a transaction involving goods. Considering the facts presented, Van Houten's change of heart and subsequent claim of the contract's invalidity due to the mirror-image rule may not will not stand in court because its not the same offer Evenwell accepted to in the email. However, if the District of