In 1944, George Bailey conveyed land and a building to the City of Bedford Falls for use as a museum. The deed said "This deed is made with the full understanding that should the property fail to be used as a museum for the City of Bedford Falls, this conveyance shall be null and void and the property shall revert to George Bailey or his heirs if the property is used for any other purpose" In 1995, the City of Bedford Falls wished to move the museum to another larger building. The City wanted to sell the property. They sought a judicial ruling that they had the right to sell the land. Judge Henry J. Potter ruled that the City owned the property as fee simple absolute and had the right to sell the property? Is the Judge correct? Specifically explain the legal rule or principle supporting your