Question
In 1968 the United States Supreme Court ruled that stops and frisks were constitutional if officers had reasonable suspicion to believe a crime was afoot.
In 1968 the United States Supreme Court ruled that stops and frisks were constitutional if officers had reasonable suspicion to believe a crime was afoot. The decades that followed were wrought with racial profiling and unjust arrests based in "Terry stops." In Floyd v. New York City, the Southern District Court of New York ruled that these stops and frisks were rooted in racial bias, and New York City's stop and frisk policy was unconstitutional. Under the city's policy, African Americans were about 30% more likely than whites to be arrested. Police Departments all over the country are re-writing policy. There is a focus on de-escalation.
Some departments are choosing not to do anything at all. Think about solutions, balancing order, ensuring police officers are safe, and ensuring a person's 4th Amendment rights are upheld.
Questions:
- As an authentic servant leader, how would you balance order,
- As an authentic servant leader, how would you make sure police officers are safe, and
- As an authentic servant leader, how would you ensure a person's 4th Amendment rights?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started