In 1982 Webster Street Partnership, Ltd. (Webster) entered into a lease agreement with Matthew Sheridan and Pat Wilwerding. Webster was aware that both Sheridan and Wilwerding were minors. Both tenants were living away from home with the understanding that they could return home at any time to live as their parents lived close-by. Sheridan and Wilwerding pald the first month's rent and then failed to pay rent for the next month and vacated the apartment. Webster sued them for breach of contract. Sheridan and Wilwerding claimed that the lease agreement was voidable because they were minors. Webster claims that the contract is enforceable because the apartment is a necessary. Who is correct? Specifically discuss the contract law rule or legal principle that applies to this case