In 2002, the Norwegian University of Science and Technology instituted a research program to study the impact of a front-end decision making regime, established two years prior, to improve major Norwegian public projects. This decision-making regime added two external reviews to the project review and approval process. The first review focused on the quality of the conceptual solution; the second review focused on the quality of the cost estimate and governance processes. The research identified ten situations ("paradoxes") where counter-intuitive decisions adversely influenced the project selection and approval process (Samset & Volden, 2016). Select two paradoxes that apply to project selection practices in your organization. Explain your selection(s) and describe the impacts to your organization's project selection practices.