In 2007, eBay started an online classifieds business called Kijiji, which was designed to compete with Craigslist, the most widely used online classifieds website in the United States.AtthetimethatitstartedKijiji,eBayowned 28.4%ofCraigslistandwasoneofonlythreestock-holders. As a result of choosing to compete with Craigslist and pursuanttotheCraigsliststockholders'agreement,eBay lost certain contractual consent rights and the right offirstrefusaloverthesharesitowned.TheothertwostockholdersaskedeBaytosellsitssharesbacktothecompany or to a third party, but eBay refused. The two stockholders responded, in their capacity as directors, by (1) adopting a plan that restricted eBay from purchasing additionalCraigslistsharesandhamperedeBay'sabilityto sell its shares to third parties, (2) implementing a staggered board to make it impossible for eBay to unilaterally elect a director to the Craigslist board, and (3) seeking to obtain a right of first refusal in Craigslist's favor over the shares eBay owned through a scheme that reduced eBay's ownership in Craigslist from 28.4% to 24.9%. eBay sued, asserting that the othertwostockholdershadbreachedthe fiduciary duties they owed eBay as a minority stock-holder. What was the result?