Question
In 2008, Lucia Carter, a retired 64-year-old, divorced her husband of 42 years. As part of the property settlement, the family home was sold and
In 2008, Lucia Carter, a retired 64-year-old, divorced her husband of 42 years. As part of the property settlement, the family home was sold and Lucias share was approximately $450,000. In addition to this amount the remainder of the property settlement amounted to an additional $550,000. Her total settlement hence amounted to $1,000,000. Since she was going through a difficult adjustment, she decided to rent a unit in Caulfield on a six-month lease but she always intended to buy a unit in the near future. Lucia went to see a friend Marilyn who was a financial planner to get advice as to how to invest the funds to secure a comfortable retirement. She made it clear to Marilyn that her priorities were income and to make the money work for her. In her initial interview with Marilyn, Lucia indicated that she intended to buy a property in the next 12 months. On the basis of their conversations, Marilyn assessed Lucia to be a growth investor and recommended the following investments. Allocated pension (1) $350,000
Allocated pension (2) $400,000
Bank shares $80,000
Unlisted property trust $90,000 Managed Australian share fund $65,000
Bank account $15,000 In mid-2008, Lucia became concerned about the market fluctuation and the rapid deterioration in the economy. She decided it was time to buy a property to live in and approached Marilyn for the funds. Lucia was shocked when Marilyn told her that it would take weeks to make the funds available as one of the allocated pensions would now need to be commuted to a lump sum. In panic mode, Lucia purchased a unit for $380,000 in August 2008. As the global financial crisis worsened, Lucia found her income declining drastically, the unlisted property trust was frozen and the value of the shares she held plummeted in value. Lucia now found her overall remaining capital had fallen by $250,000. She now had insufficient funds to provide sufficient income for her everyday needs and was forced to apply for the Age Pension. Review this case and answer the following questions: a. Was the advisors assessment of Lucias risk profile correct?
b. Given Lucia expressed the desire to purchase a property in the near future, was the asset allocation appropriate?
c. Was Marilyn truly listening to Lucias goals?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started