In 2010, musician Courtney Love, widow of the band Nirvana's front man Kurt Cobain, posted a tweet after her attorney Rhonda Holmes declined to file a fraud case against the people managing Cobain's estate. In the tweet, Love accused Holmes of bribery, tweeting, "I was fdevestated [sic] when Rhonda J. Holmes esq. of san diego was bought off @FairNewsSpears perhaps you can get a quote." Attorney Holmes sued Love for defamation. Love argued that the tweet should be considered an opinion and therefore was not defamatory and testified that the tweet had been intended as a private message and that it was accidentally published. A Superior Court judge in Los Angeles rejected Love's argument, leaving it to a jury to determine how defamation should be applied to Twitter communications and other online media. Based on your understanding of defamation law, what are the issues the jury had to take into consideration to determine if Love indeed was liable for defamation?