In a criminal trial, the prosecution called an expert witness to the stand. The prosecutor conducted a direct examination of the witness that lasted one-half hour. The defense attorney cross-examined the witness for three days and told the court that he planned to spend at least another day in cross-examination to develop testimony brought up on direct examination. The prosecutor moved that the cross-examination be terminated by the court. May the court approve the prosecutor's motion? Group of answer choices No, because in a criminal trial the consideration of judicial economy is outweighed by due process. Yes, because the defendant had an adequate opportunity for meaningful cross-examination. Yes, unless the testimony is relevant. No, because the testimony relates to the subject matter of direct