In a frustrated response to the conduct of religious fundamentalist TLM students, a group of social activist
Question:
In a frustrated response to the conduct of religious fundamentalist TLM students, a group of social activist high school students calling themselves "National Organization for Students Against Proselytizing Students" (NO-SAPS), put together a short satirical performance they titled "TLM: The Limp Morons." The satire poked fun at the TLM students' religious beliefs, and suggested hypocrisy by TLM students in their personal and sexual conduct. Unannounced to school officials, NO-SAPS students presented this short skit at the end of the school convocation. Although nothing in the short presentation was obscene, the satire included some vulgar and lewd gestures by students suggesting or simulating sexual acts. School officials suspended NO-SAPS students for this performance. The NO-SAPS students (P) sue school officials (D) claiming free speech protections for their performance.
Who's likely to prevail in court?