In a negligence suit arising from a car accident, defendant asked the plaintiff, "Isn't it true you've been issued five speeding tickets in the past five years? Plaintiff objects.

Which is the strongest argument?

	A.	Plaintiff: "Objection to the improper use of character evidence under FRE 404(B).
	B.	Defendant: "This evidence is relevant to prove that because the plaintiff has a history of speeding in the past, it's more likely he was speeding this time as well, and thus caused this accident."
	C.	Plaintiff: "It is improper to ask the plaintiff about prior crimes, wrongs or other acts; this type of evidence is relevant only to a defendant."
	D.	None of the above.