Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
In a similar case (TNL-63280-14-RO), the landlords sought to terminate a tenancy and evict a tenant due to substantial interference with others' enjoyment and rights.
In a similar case (TNL-63280-14-RO), the landlords sought to terminate a tenancy and evict a tenant due to substantial interference with others' enjoyment and rights. The court ruled that the tenant could not use marijuana, including smoking or vaporizing, in the rental unit and complex for the next 12 months. The tenancy was terminated, and the tenant was ordered to pay the landlords $170.00. This case demonstrates that landlords have the authority to establish terms within their properties to maintain a comfortable environment for all residents. This case reinforces the concept that landlords have the authority to refuse to lease to potential tenants who may not comply with these terms. Therefore you are not obligated to rent to Mike. is this answer correct and is the wording alright
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started