In a survey, 44% of the respondents stated that they talk to their pets on the telephone. A veterinarian believed this result to be too high, so he randomly selected 160 pet owners and discovered that 68 of them spoke to their pet on the telephone. Does the velerinarian have a right to be skeptical? Use the a = 0.1 level of significance. Because npo (1 -Po) = 10, the sample size is 5% of the population size, and the sample the requirements for testing the hypothesis satisfied. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) What are the null and alternative hypotheses? Ho V V versus H, (Type integers or decimals. Do not round.) Find the test statistic, zo Zo =(Round to two decimal places as needed.) Find the P-value. P-value = (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Does the veterinarian have a right to be skeptical? O A. The veterinarian has a right to be skeptical. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is not 44% O B. The veterinarian does not have a right to be skeptical. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is 44% C. The veterinarian has a right to be skeptical. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is less than 44% O D. The veterinarian does not have a right to be skeptical. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is less than 44% Next 6:45 PM Type here to search O Fi 52 F Clear ~ 9 0 9 4() 12/16/2021