In an Electronic Frontiers Foundation "Report on Data Aggregation"EFF Report on Data Aggregation $-$ PDF Document $(98\mathrm{.}1$ KB$)$The authors state, "Large databases are targets for malicious users, criminals, and terrorists." It is unlikely that even the most sophisticated database security technology with unlimited funding will be immune to attack, especially as the data inside the databases are aggregated from more sources $($and therefore of more value$).$ Do you agree or disagree with the authors? Why or why not A Sep $19,2014$ news report in the Wall Street Journal entitled, "Moscow Considers Moves to Secure and Defend Internet in Russia" commented that the Russian government is considering a "temporary cutoff of the Russian Internet from the global network as a contingency in the event of an emergency situation." Another Russian official "confirmed the government was preparing an action plan in case the Russian segment of the Internet was shut down from the outside. But he said there weren't plans to isolate the Russian Internet from the global network" Is the technology discussed in class sufficient to protect individuals and governments from attacks launched over the internet? Why or why not?