Question
In Australian law, what issues does direct interference poses in proving trespass to person? What is the extent to which Australian law is consistent with,
In Australian law, what issues does direct interference poses in proving trespass to person? What is the extent to which Australian law is consistent with, or diverges from, the position taken in England or other international jurisdictions on the topic of directness?
Cases to consider:
- Scott v Shepherd (1773) 96 ER 525
- Platt v Nutt [1988] Aust Torts Reports 80-164
Refer to: https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/journal_contribution/Abolition_or_Reform_The_Future_for_Directness_as_a_Requirement_of_Trespass_in_Australia/10064021?backTo=/collections/Volume_34_Issue_1/4723145
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started