In Boucher v Wal$-$Mart Canada Corp., the Ontario Court of Appeal held that:

the punitive award against Wal$-$Mart and Boucher$$s supervisor should be reduced because the large awards for aggravated damages already contained an element of punishment

the punitive award against Wal$-$Mart and Boucher$$s supervisor should be increased because their misconduct was especially serious, placing it $$at the highest end of the scale$$

the punitive award against Boucher$$s supervisor should be eliminated as it is not fair to make such an award against an individual

none of the above