In Bouton vs$.$ Byers $,$ the state appellate court ruled that

Question $19$Select one:

a$.$

the application of the promissory estoppol doctrine to the plaintiff$$s case was improper since there was an enforceable contract in place.

b$.$

there was no enforceable contract in this case such that the plaintiff$$s claim against the defendant should be denied for lack of consideration.

c$.$

the application of the promissory estoppel doctrine to the plaintiff$$s case was proper since the plaintiff was reasonable and justified in her reliance on the defendant$$s promise.

d$.$

the application of the quasi$-$contract doctrine to the plaintiff$$s case was proper since the defendant was unjustly enriched at the expense of the plaintiff.

e$.$

there was an enforceable contract between the plaintiff and defendant.