In Bouton vs. Byers , the state appellate court ruled that

Select one:

a.

the application of the quasi-contract doctrine to the plaintiff's case was proper since the defendant was unjustly enriched at the expense of the plaintiff.

b.

there was an enforceable contract between the plaintiff and defendant.

c.

the application of the promissory estoppol doctrine to the plaintiff's case was improper since there was an enforceable contract in place.

d.

the application of the promissory estoppel doctrine to the plaintiff's case was proper since the plaintiff was reasonable and justified in her reliance on the defendant's promise.

e.

there was no enforceable contract in this case such that the plaintiff's claim against the defendant should be denied for lack of consideration.