In Broadbent v. Broadbent, in what way did the Arizona Supreme Court revise the existing law on parent-child tort immunity?

A) The court revised the existing law to permit a child to sue a parent for injuries cause by reckless or wanton conduct.

B) The court revised the existing law to permit a child to sue a parent for injuries caused by negligence according to a "palpably unreasonable" standard.

C) The court revised the existing law to permit a child to sue a parent for intentional wrongdoing.

D) The court revised the existing law to permit a child to sue a parent for injuries caused by negligence according to a "reasonable and prudent parent" standard.