InChalfant v. Titan Distribution, Inc.,how can one reconcile that Titan was found to have violated the American Disabilities Act ("ADA") when in order for Chalfant to meet the first element of making a prima facie case for an ADA violation, Chalfant had to prove that Titan believed Chalfant was restricted to a job that fell within that category of light to medium strength demands, which according to the occupational classification system prevented Chalfant from performing 70% of the jobs at Titan? Is this fair? Why or why not? Consider public policy behind ADA when answering the question.