In Chapter 11 Case Study 3, is Gordon Linder obligated to require Mr. McGill to provide the documentation for the business deductions? State you reason why or why not.

Chapter 11 Hypothetical Case 3, Evan McGill is a prominent member of the community. His entrepreneurial rise to wealth and power is known throughout Madison County, where he was born and continues to live and operate his business, McGill Construction Company. McGill is an active member of the community and is proud of his service as a deacon at the local Baptist church. . Gordon Linder has been McGill's personal and business accountant for the past 20 years. McGill pays Linder generously for his accounting services, and Linder's professional relationship with the businessman has generated him scores of other clients. In fact, it could be said that Linder owes his professional success, and the health of his accounting practice, to McGill. . During tax season, McGill arrives at Linder's office for preparation of his personal and business tax returns. When Linder asks McGill about his deductible business expenses, McGill quotes a figure of $148,000; however, he is only able to provide documentation for $120,000 of the expenses.Chapter 11 Hypothetical Case 3, . When Linder asks McGill for documentation of the additional $28,000, McGill states, "You know I don't have the time or inclination to keep every receipt, and you also know I have a photographic memory. I can tell you where I ate lunch on November 7, 1990, and I can tell you that I had exactly $148,000 in business expenses last year. Besides, if I get audited, that's my problem, not yours." From an ethical standpoint, is it permissible for Linder to take McGill's word for it with regard to the nondocumented $28,000 in business deductions? From a professional and legal standpoint, are there risks inherent in Linder's acceptance of McGill's assertion without documentation