Question
In Conti v. ASPCA , 77 Misc.2d 61 (1974), were there any prior proceedings or just the action of replevin brought by the plaintiffs? Also,
In Conti v. ASPCA, 77 Misc.2d 61 (1974), were there any prior proceedings or just the action of replevin brought by the plaintiffs? Also, what was the legal issue? I know the holding was that the humane society was the true owner and was entitled to possession of the bird, Chester, but I am not sure of the legal issue.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started
The Legal Environment of Business
Authors: Roger E. Meiners, Al H. Ringleb, Frances L. Edwards
13th edition
1337095494, 978-1337516044, 133751604X, 978-1337095495
