Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

In Cwm Llif, each household has a wealth of 9 0 , 0 0 0 and a utility represented by U ( W ) =

In Cwm Llif, each household has a wealth of 90,000 and a utility represented by U(W)=W2. Villagers live in three different areas, with different risks of having their homes flooded in any given year, as follows:
\table[[Area of village,# of households,Probability of flooding],[Bryn,200,0.06],[Dl,200,0.15],[Nant,200,0.30]]
Suffering a flood reduces wealth to 40,000. Assume that flooding risk is idiosyncratic - each household floods independently of others in the village.
In the absence of flood insurance, what is the expected utility of the households in Bryn?
In the absence of flood insurance, what is the expected utility of the households in Dl?
In the absence of flood insurance, what is the expected utility of the households in Nant?
The national government sets up an insurance plan for flooding in Cwm Llif that is intended to be self-financing over the long run, and provide full cover. Membership is optional, but since everyone is risk averse, the government assume that everybody will join. Premiums are set according to the chance that an average household gets flooded. Assume that equal proportions of the population live in each area. What is the premium?
If this premium is charged, which households will join the plan?
Calculate the expected profits or losses for the insurance plan.
Why has the scheme not broken even, as planned?
After the first year of operation, the government commissions a study to discover the probability that a member of the insurance plan gets flooded. It finds that the probability of flooding is 22.5%. For the second year of operation, they fix a new premium based on breaking even with this probability of flooding. What is the new premium?
Who joins the plan in the 2 nd year?
Does the plan break even in year 2?
Suppose now that the government gets smart and offers three plans, as follows:
Plan A: 15,000 premium for full cover;
Plan B: 1,275 premium for 17% cover;
Plan C: 150 premium for 5% cover.
Show that this set of contracts satisfies the participation constraints (all households choose to take out a plan), incentive-compatibility constraints (each household type takes out a different plan) and is sustainable (the government does not make a loss when offering them).
image text in transcribed

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Contemporary Financial Management

Authors: Don Cyr, Alfred Kahl, William Rentz, R. Moyer

1st Edition

017616992X, 978-0176169923

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

What are major risk factors for mental disorders?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Should job descriptions be abandoned in recruitment and selection?

Answered: 1 week ago