In Dodson v. Shrader, the court held that: Group of answer choices when a minor disaffirms a contract, the minor should be held responsible for the depreciation and use of, and damages to, the goods that they purchase and then return. under the doctrine of disaffirmance, a minor may not be held liable for wear and tear. a boy was able to disaffirm a contract for an expensive stereo. the contract involved necessaries, and thus it could not be disaffirmed