In Dow Chemical v$.$ Blum, the court found that the Environmental Protection Agency $($EPA$)$:

Did not have sufficient reasons for suspending sales of $2,4,5-$T

Satisfied the Court's own stringent and independent analysis that suspending sales of $2,4,5-$T is the right thing to do$.$

Gave sufficient reasons for suspending $2,4,5-$T$,$ even though the evidence about the chemical actually causing spontaneous abortions in Alsea, Oregon was not conclusive.