In Dr. Yale's experiment in the previous question the results revealed that there are no significant differences between the reference (crime scene) and suspect samples. In a court setting, what would this result be interpreted as? Select all that apply. (No part marks) A If the results demonstrate that there are no differences between the two samples, then that must mean they are similar. B The samples are consistent with each other. C The experiment suggests that the identity of the perpetrator is likely to be confirmed. D A statistical statement, such as a probability calculation or technique error rate is not necessary because the samples match. E An expert witness' job in court includes educating the Trier of Fact regarding the matching technique and its reliability