In Duncan v. General Motors sexual discrimination case based on maintaining a "hostile work place environment", the majority of the appeals judges believed the facts were not significant or egregious enough to find that the work place was hostile. To understand the full case please read "Workplace discrimination" in the Week 5 module.

(A) Do you believe that the judges should have substituted their own opinions on how serious Duncan's conduct in place of the jury's opinion which was based on hearing the direct testimony and evidence? Explain your answer.