InGhanam v. Does, the court examined a public figure's defamation claim against anonymous bloggers. A writer's First Amendment rights include the ability to publish and distribute writings anonymously. However, the right to anonymous speech is not absolute. Under what circumstances is a plaintiff in a defamation action entitled to discover the identity of an anonymous critic?Do you believe that permitting a plaintiff to discover the identity of an anonymous critic has an unduly chilling effect on free speech?Did the court in Ghanam allow the plaintiff to discover the identity of his anonymous critics?Why or why not? Why would one agree with the court's decision?