In "Humans are Determined," Baron d'Holbach argues that we do not have free will - that, in the terminology of the course text, "Hard Determinism" is true. Is he right? Why or why not. In summarizing the relevant parts of the reading from d'Holbach it's essential to demonstrate, through quotations and careful summary, a sound grasp of the relevant parts of the reading. Please be sure to give some attention to whether the possibility of what Carroll and Markosian term "Chancy Causation" weakens or undermines support for Hard Determinism. The answer should focus on the reading from d'Holbach.