In In re Z.S., why did the Maine Supreme Court affirm the trial court's order permitting the State to administer routine vaccinations to a child while the child was in State custody?

A) The court held that the State as custodian of the child had the right to make medical decisions for the child.

B) The court held that the child might infect other children and the vaccinations were therefore necessary on an emergency basis.

C) The court held that the mother lost all decision-making authority for the child once the child had been removed from her custody.

D) The court held that the mother's parental rights were likely to be terminated and she therefore had no standing to object to the child's vaccinations.