In Johnson v Marine Roofing Repair and Maintenance Service 2003., Johnson was accused of fraudulent behavior by his employer. Johnson sued for reasonable damages under common law. The employer countered that it had just cause for . dismissal based on fraudulent expense and time sheets. The court found there was no just cause for the dismissal because there was no proof Johnson had intentionally been dishonest. Which of the following key lessons does this decision reinforce? Oa) employers have a right to fire employees they think are fraudulent Ob) the investigator must be impartial and not start off with an assumption of guilt c) employers are under no requirement to rush investigations (d) an employer must avoid making an ultimatum such as "accept the offer or be fired for cause and be ineligible for El" e). b and c