In KELO V. NEW LONDON(2005) Justice O'Connor wrote the Midkiff opinion upon which Kelo is based. However, she dissented in Kelo. What were her primary dissenting arguments against the majority opinion in Kelo? What socio-economic considerations did Justice Thomas propose in his dissenting opinion Kelo? Do you agree with them, and why or why not? If you do agree, would you have nevertheless voted with the majority? In what ways have states and their citizens protected themselves from Kelo takings after the opinion was announced?