Question
In large-scale conspiracies, multiple people can be convicted as being part of the conspiracy without even all knowing each other. For example, in a chain
In large-scale conspiracies, multiple people can be convicted as being part of the conspiracy without even all knowing each other. For example, in a chain conspiracy, it is highly unlikely that the individual smuggling the drugs into the United States personally entered into an "agreement" with the dealer ultimately selling them at a college fraternity party. Is this fair? Should the prosecution need to prove an agreement between each party beyond a reasonable doubt? Why or why not? Or is this a necessary tool for prosecutors?
In large-scale conspiracies, multiple people can be convicted as being part of the conspiracy without even all knowing each other. For example, in a chain conspiracy, it is highly unlikely that the individual smuggling the drugs into the United States personally entered into an "agreement" with the dealer ultimately selling them at a college fraternity party. Is this fair? Should the prosecution need to prove an agreement between each party beyond a reasonable doubt? Why or why not? Or is this a necessary tool for prosecutors?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
The question of whether convicting multiple individuals in a conspiracy without them all knowing each other is fair is complex and can be approached from multiple angles Lets break down the various as...
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started
Smith and Roberson Business Law
Authors: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts
15th Edition
1285141903, 1285141903, 9781285141909, 978-0538473637
