In light of your examination of the assigned passages referring to women's roles and the place of marriage, do you concur that Colossians and Ephesians are probably not Paul's work, and that Ticus and 1 Timothy are almost definitely not his? If so, what could have been some of the motives of the pacudeplaraphers for using Paul's name, do you think. and was it their inbent to deceive? If you don't think the letters are pacudommous, why don't you think so, and how would you account for the evidence? As for the non-canonical Acts of Paul and Thecla (which is anonymous not pecudonymous because it doesn't claim to have been authored by Paul or Thecdal, where does that early Christian writing fit in? Could it actually be closer to Paul's teaching on women's roles and the place of marriage in the undisputed letters and thus more "authentic than some of the disputed Paulines in the NT canon