In McKlesky v. Kemp (1987), McKlesky argued that the death penalty was unconstitutional as applied in Georgia because people were much more likely to be sentenced to death if they had killed a white person than a black person. And this pattern was stronger for black defendants than white defendants. They presented research with data from Georgia supporting these claims. What did the US Supreme Court conclude about the case? a. the system is not biased b. the system is biased and needs to be reformed c. the statistics are irrelevant because there are more white people in the US than black people d. the statistics don't matter for McKlesky's case because McKlesky did not prove that race was the reason why he was sentenced to death in his specific case