in my career, I have encountered both effective and poor examples of performance management, which can be analyzed through the lens of the professional performance management model and contingency leadership theory.

An example of effective performance management was observed when working under the leadership of Sarah. She diligently applied the professional performance management model by setting clear and achievable goals for our team (P1). Sarah did not limit feedback to annual reviews but instead had regular one-on-one meetings, providing ongoing feedback (P2) that helped us gauge our progress and address issues promptly. Moreover, she actively supported our professional development (P3), fostering a culture of continuous improvement. Sarah also excelled in recognizing and rewarding our accomplishments (P4), boosting our motivation and commitment. Documentation (P5) was a crucial part of her approach, ensuring that performance discussions were well-documented for reference.

Conversely, in a different role with John, poor performance management was evident. John neglected several aspects of the professional performance management model. He seldom communicated clear goals (P1), leaving team members unsure of their priorities. Feedback was infrequent and limited to annual reviews (P2), hindering our ability to make real-time improvements. There was little emphasis on professional development (P3), forcing team members to seek growth independently. Rewards and recognition (P4) were rare, leading to low morale. Documentation (P5) was minimal, making it challenging to substantiate decisions or track improvements.

Applying contingency leadership theory to these scenarios, Sarah demonstrated an adaptive leadership style. She tailored her approach based on individual needs, offering support and guidance (relationship-oriented leadership) when needed and allowing autonomy (task-oriented leadership) for more experienced team members. In contrast, John's leadership style was rigid, applying a one-size-fits-all approach. He failed to consider the individual needs and motivations of his team members, which could have been more effective in facilitating their growth and performance.

In summary, effective performance management encompasses clear communication, ongoing feedback, support for development, and recognition of achievements. It involves proactive leadership that adapts to individual needs. Poor performance management, as exemplified by John, often results from neglecting these fundamental principles and using a rigid, non-adaptive leadership approach.

HELLO! I JUST NEED A RESPONSE TO MY CLASSMATES POST IN THE DISCUSSION BOARD!