In "Of Liberty and Necessity", Davud Hume argues that a more careful definition of terms can allow us to resolve the contradiction between the claim that we have liberty, and the claim that all events happen necessarily. What arguments does Hume offer to support his attempt to resolve this apparent contradiction? Has Hume resolved the contradiction? Why or why not? Please be sure give some attention to the role that his account of causation as constant conjunction plays. Your answer should focus on Hume's discussion of liberty and necessity and demonstrate, through quotations and careful summary, a sound grasp of the relevant parts of the reading.