In order to get Susan to buy his cottage, Paul tells her that he has recently spent $100 000 in repairs that make its foundations flawless. In love with the cottage and in reliance on Paul's representation, Susannah impulsively purchases the cottage without asking for a home inspection.

Two months after she moves into the cottage, Susannah hears a creaking noise during a windy evening.

The next morning, she has a home inspector over to take a look. He tells her that there have been no repairs on the house in the last 20 years and that the foundation is in a dangerous state of disrepair. Is the contract voidable due to misrepresentation? [Use 3-step legal analysis]