Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

In Padilla v. Kentucky, 130 S. Ct. 1473 (2010), the Supreme Court in a landmark decision held that noncitizens had a Sixth Amendment right to

In Padilla v. Kentucky, 130 S. Ct. 1473 (2010), the Supreme Court in a landmark decision held that noncitizens had a Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel which involved competent legal advice regarding the immigration consequences of a guilty plea. If a noncitizen did not receive competent or accurate advice in this regard, his plea of guilty may be vacated on constitutional grounds based on Padilla. Padilla, however, would not retroactively apply to convictions that became final before the effective date of Padilla(March 31, 2010) pursuant to the Supreme Court's ruling in Chaidez v. the United States. Do you feel Padilla should have been made retroactive or not and why? If you feel Padilla should apply retroactively, should there be a cut-off date?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Tort Law Responsibilities And Redress

Authors: John C. P. Goldberg, Leslie Kendrick, Anthony J. Sebok, Benjamin C. Zipursky

5th Edition

1543806805, 978-1543806809

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions