InPatt v. Donner, assume instead of suing Donner for anti-discrimination based on federal law, Patt sues Donner only on a housing claim for anti-discrimination based on California state law for $100,000. Donner is a citizen of New York. Patt is a citizen of California. Does the federal court have proper subject matter jurisdiction to hear Patt's claim?

Select one:a. No, because the claim is no longer a federal question.b. No, because there are no grounds to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over this state law claim.c. Yes, because the claim meets the requirements of the diversity statute.d. Yes, because the claim raises a federal question.e. None of the above