In Patterson v. CitiMortgage, incorporated, 820 F.3d 1273 (t1th Cir. 2016), the case in the text, the court held that: Multiple Choice under Georgla low, a court may not rescind a contract based on a unilateral mistake. CitiMortgage could not rescind the contract becouse its acts were negligent. the parties' negotiations demonstaled Cin Mortgsge's mivake was obvious and Potterson knew or should have known that it was a mistake. Cailortgage could not rescind the contract because it should hove been aware of its mistake