In POM$$ Wonderful, LLC v$.$ Coca$-$Cola Company$,$ the court held that$\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.$

Question content area bottom

Part $1$

A$.$

$$Coca$-$Cola's labeling violated the law

B$.$

There is no private right of action under the Lanham Act

C$.$

POM could not bring an action under Section $43$ of the Lanham Act

D$.$

POM could proceed with an action under Section $43$ of the Lanham Act

E$.$

the case could be dismissed